When I discuss leadership style with coaches, they often nod
in agreement with the descriptions and can mentally visualize someone from each
group. I’m sure my readers can picture a coach or boss who fits each category.
The successful leader learns how to use a combination of styles. Imagine an
emergency situation needing an instant response. You don’t have time to allow
the group to discuss which options are best for this particular emergency. You
must be the authoritarian leader; the democratic style will not work for this
situation. Leaders find a balance that allows them to lead as the situation
directs.
In my last blog, I discussed Dr. John A. Kline’s pamphlet on
listening. Dr. Kline authored an article titled Communication and Leadership in which he talks about the working climate in a group. Savvy
leaders foster good working climates. Kline labels his organizational climates
as dehumanized climate, overhumanized climate, and situational climate. These
climates mesh well with leadership styles. The dehumanized climate assumes
subordinates cannot perform without directives—much like the authoritarian leadership
style—and must be told exactly what to do, when to do it, and how to do it. As
you have probably guessed, the overhumanized climate is the opposite of
dehumanized. In a sense, this is similar to the laissez-faire leadership style. Motivation (if any) comes from the
individual and concerns for the individual are more important that meeting
objectives or production. The situational climate is a balance of the
dehumanized and overhumanized. The name describes the term—the climate is
flexible so that it changes to fit the situation. Smart leaders learn how to
lead for the situation at hand.
Our leadership style also guides our verbal communications
to the group and individuals. The use of “you” or “you people” is like pointing
a finger—blaming or criticizing. The use of “we” is inclusive—it includes the
speaker and the group. “We” indicates teamwork; it shows that all are important
to the group or organization.
Our leadership style demonstrates how we feel about our
organizations, our people; it is a form of communication. Another form of
communication that can help build healthy and productive organizational
climates is internal communication. This includes the variety of ways we
communicate within our organization. This may be memos, guidelines,
newsletters—those forms of communication that get information to those whom it
relates. The Community Tool Box has an excellent website devoted to sharing information
to help build successful and productive organizations. They assert several good reasons for using
internal communication: to improve the
efficiency of the group, to keep everyone updated on recent events in the
group, to be able to react quickly to emergencies or major changes, to provide
a means for everyone to share ideas, to promote an open climate and
collegiality in the group, to empower those in the group, to demonstrate
fairness and respect for all, to promote transparency as it relates to problems
or concerns, to ensure accurate information is being shared by all.
Organizations who communicate successfully through internal communication can
be more productive and find their employees feel as if they are part of the
team.
Newsletters are an excellent means of internal
communication. Weekly or monthly newsletters can meet a variety of
needs—important employee information, organization updates, calendar of events,
highlighting teams and individuals for success, even birthdays and new babies
can be part of the recognition. These can be printed or emailed. Adding audio,
video and hot links adds to the entertainment and informational value of
newsletters. I know owners of large cheerleading and gymnastic gyms that
publish monthly newsletters. These are important to their members as they
include a monthly calendar with competitions and team practice dates. The
newsletters also give parents information about traveling arrangements, fee
updates, charity events, etc. The cheerleaders, gymnasts, parents, and coaches
are part of the organization as a whole as well as smaller groups within the
organization.
Some organizations find newsletters impractical or not as
useful, so they may turn to emails for the majority of their internal
communications. Emails are immediate and can be as short or as long as needed.
They can also be saved and filed electronically. Distribution lists make this
process easy if only one group needs to be contacted. In a study by Parsons and Urbanski those
surveyed in a media organization said email was the best method of
communication within their group.
A company in Korea, LG CNS Co., has developed their own type of Twitter for their 7,000
employees to communicate internally. Their employees use the smart phone
application for reminders about seminars, find help with test products, and a
myriad of other professional uses. As their tweets are accompanied by the
employee’s name and picture, chances are slim the app is misused or abused.
Being a leader can be daunting. Leaders are required to be
proficient in an amazing number of skills—some believe communication is the
most important of these. Developing a balanced style of leadership, promoting a
climate of trust and openness, and meeting the communication needs of those
above and below on the organizational chart will help ensure the success of any
organization or business.
No comments:
Post a Comment